March 26, 2008

REVIEW: 21 (C-)

Background: Before anything else, I need to disclose a few things that colored my impression of 21. First, I went to college in Boston (specifically, at Boston University, the primary filming location for the movie) and I know my around the Las Vegas Strip. Secondly, though I don't know how to count cards, I am familiar with the story that eventually turned into Ben Mezrich's book Bringing Down the House, which was adapted into 21 (and given the new title to avoid confusion with the Steve Martin/Queen Latifah comedy classic). Neither of those facts make me special, but together they produced a lot of distractions that other viewers might have missed. Anyway, 21 was directed by Robert Luketic (Legally Blonde, Monster-In-Law) and stars veterans Kevin Spacey (Superman Returns) and Laurence Fishburne (Bobby), along with up-and-comers Jim Sturgess (Across the Universe) and Kate Bosworth (Superman Returns). Controversy has been brewing for some time about the casting of the film, since all of the original members of the actual MIT team in 1994 were Asian-American males. It's only 2008, though, so Sturgess (an Englishman) was hired as the lead for no sensible reason other than to see if he can pull off an American accent (he can't). Of course, 21 is meant to be a "loose" adaptation, and I guess the multiple documentary versions of the story weren't sexy enough (cue Bosworth, though her character has some basis in reality). Hollywoodization was the next logical step, but at least Jeff Ma, on whom Sturgess' character is based, has a cameo as a Blackjack dealer at Planet Hollywood.

Synopsis: Ben Campbell (Sturgess) is a saint and a genius. It's his senior year at MIT and he's applied for a prestigious full-ride scholarship to Harvard Medical School, but during his initial interview he's told his resume doesn't "jump off the page" and he glumly goes back to his blameless life. How will he get $300,000 to pay for tuition and expenses? Certainly not from the robotics project he's been working on with his impossibly nerdy friends, nor from his $8/hr job. Fortunately, opportunity comes knocking when his professor, Micky Rosa (Spacey), recruits him to join Rosa's secret Blackjack club, which also happens to include Ben's crush, Jill Taylor (Bosworth), on its roster. Initially hesitant, Ben is awkwardly seduced by Jill with a necktie and he decides winning at Blackjack is his only way to pay for med school. The plan is simple, and brilliant: the "spotters" will count the cards in the deck to determine the probability of what's left to play before signaling Ben in to the table to bet big when the deck is "hot." Micky takes the crew to Vegas for their first of many successful weekend trips, however hormones and tensions rage as Ben and Jill grow close and a jerk member of the team grows jealous of Ben's success. To make matters worse, Cole Williams (Fishburne) is monitoring the group's activity from his lair below Planet Hollywood, where they often play. Vegas is phasing out security firms in place of face-detection technologies, and Williams is fighting for his job and his trade. Counting cards is not illegal, but Williams will provide "services" (beatdowns) to casinos that become aware of gamblers counting at their tables. It doesn't take long before Micky's plan unravels - Ben is greedy and arrogant and Williams is waiting to strike. By this point the movie is a full-on farce, and before it casually ends we're treated to fake moustaches, cheesy dialogue and something missing from too many movies: a chase through a restaurant kitchen.

I Loved:
+ The nostalgia of seeing BU inside and out on the big screen. Alumni will recognize the Mugar basement, the BU Pub (and Castle), the new fitness center (new since I went there), Bay State Road and other spots. You probably won't recognize the Hotel Commonwealth in Kenmore Square (I didn't), which was apparently dressed up as a Las Vegas spa.

I Liked:
+ Kevin Spacey as a more believable villain than his Lex Luthor. His work since 1999 has been embarrassing, but he still has a twinkle in his eye. On the same note, Laurence Fishburne has also been underachieving lately, hasn't he?
+ The soundtrack - appropriate, energetic, and thankfully missing Elvis Presley's "A Little Less Conversation."
+ Aaron Yoo (Rocket Science) and Liza Lapira (Cloverfield) in charming supporting roles - and I guess I appreciated that they're Asian-American.

I Disliked:
- The almost obscenely predictable cliché
s: steamy Chinatown with the year-round Chinese New Year celebration and parade; "Sir - you forgot your bag" (were you holding your breath?); the clandestine, underground security dungeon (why is it always so dark in those rooms with monitors?); the 2.0.9. competition triumph; the sound of cards landing on the table with the force of an atomic bomb; "Me and Micky Rosa go way back..." (you don't say!); etc., etc., etc.
- Jim Sturgess, unfortunately. I don't know what it was here, but he didn't fit and the voiceovers were terrible. The accent and terrible script didn't help.

I Hated:
- The ridiculous errors in geography. I'll leave the Boston stuff alone (but - Jill lives in Quincy?) because most people aren't familiar enough with it, but the Las Vegas Strip is too well-known for such egregious errors. They stay at the Hard Rock (not even on Las Vegas Blvd.) and stroll downstairs to the brand new Red Rock Casino (about 15 miles away from the Strip)? The penthouse at the Hard Rock overlooks the Bellagio from across the street? Uh, not even close. You wouldn't put the Empire State Building overlooking Central Park. What's the difference here?
- The jaw-dropping script that featured some of the worst dialogue I've heard in years: "I've already lost everything; I don't want to lose you, too."

Writing - 4
Acting - 6
Production - 9
Emotional Impact - 8
Music - 5
Significance - 3

Total: 35/50= 70% = C-

Last Word: Despite being a terribly-made movie in almost every aspect, 21 actually comes together as a fun and flashy weekend romp in Vegas. In that sense it's achieved its only purpose, since it would be preposterous to suggest it either tells a true story or includes any meaningful lessons. Sure to inspire a new generation of card counters in the same way Fight Club and Rounders created their respective subcultures, 21 is also the most successful commercial Las Vegas has ever produced for the college set (compared to what I accidentally saw this morning - the worst music video ever). Planet Hollywood, which opened just last year, clearly had a major advertising stake in 21, as did the Red Rock and Hard Rock casinos, neither of which are considered Vegas hotspots. Details aside, there are moments of cheap comedy (a fat kid eating Twinkies, Kevin Spacey in disguise, etc.) that try to hide the underlying tragedy: a movie that had almost unlimited potential has been turned into a lazy mess of
clichés. At times like this you really have to wonder how the guy who directed Legally Blonde got his hands on the juiciest unproduced material that has come along in years. 21 strives to be a guilty pleasure at the highest level, but my inability to swallow major inaccuracies prevented me from having any fun, and more than once my movie-watching intelligence was insulted by the writing. In the end, I was left holding the bag full of chocolate gold bullion.


  1. This is disappointing. The trailer doesn't look great, but I was hoping it wouldn't be this bad. The stuff about the "whitening" of the real players and the Las Vegas georgraphy piss me off the most. That would be like setting a movie at Disneyland and having the characters drive 5 minutes and be in San Francisco. Awful there.

    Too bad about Sturgess. He was ok-pretty good in Across the Universe, but he sounds awful here.

    Would it have been so bad to use at least a majority of Asian-American actors? Grrr.

    Great review.

  2. Interesting you should mention the soundtrack. I liked it it too as a whole, but I don't want to review it until I've seen the movie. Great review!

  3. "and given the new title to avoid confusion with the Steve Martin/Queen Latifah comedy classic"


  4. Great review. Even though I have not seen this movie. Or read the book Bringing Down the House. But I have seen the 2-hour History Channel documentary Breaking Vegas, which I thought was truly excellent.

    So, as soon as I saw the preview for this film, I got turned off immediately because it looked so preposterously different than the facts that were presented in the documentary. The preview already seemed to give away to me that the "the guy who directed Legally Blonde" just took some really interesting source material, and twisted it into a ridiculous joke version. Having read your review, I have even more reasons to skip it. Cheers.

  5. Thanks for the compliments, all, though I picked at 21 like a casino buffet more than I really reviewed it. It's as shallow as they come, though, so I'm not too worried about it.

    Hehe, good analogy with the geography, Fletch, and I was pretty disappointed with the casting, too. Not to the point of boycotting it or anything, but it's a major strike and it was completely unnecessary. Regarding Sturgess - I loved him in Across the Universe, but I knew not to expect much here. At the same time, I can't say there are many young American actors that I would have loved to see in his place.

    The music fits the mood pretty well, soundtrackgeek. I look forward to revisiting it in your in-depth review.

    Yeah, Craig, it's a stand alone joke that I just grabbed from Wikipedia page about the book, but it drives home the mismanagement of this movie. Someone should have had the foresight to "reserve" that title earlier.

    I haven't seen the BBC doc, Josh, but I remember you saying that it didn't look anything like this. I'm going "bet" that you're right.

  6. I am not in for this one I am afraid. As much as I thought Jim was great in Across the Universe, I just do not care for this film. I have read the book on which the film is based and it was a hell of a good read. I doubt the film can top the book, which means it is all downhill from there, and I am not interested. I know this is terribly ignorant of me, but I don't even care.

    Great review though, I would listen to you talk for hours on the background of the area where the film was, well, filmed, and your time at Boston U. but I am afraid the thought of this film makes me ill. I hope something good opens for you to see soon, not any more of this kind of crap.

  7. Thanks, Nick.

    "I know this is terribly ignorant of me, but I don't even care."

    Well that's an odd statement considering you're the only one who's read the book! It's definitely not worth you making any extra effort to see, but despite my harsh review it's not as bad as some of the other big releases these days, if for no other reason than the fact that it's an original story. It's as bad a movie as I'll ever recommend.

    Anyway, hope to make to Boston or Las Vegas if you make it stateside anytime soon!

  8. I agree with Fletch. The geography issue is huge. The only place where it didn't really bother me was in the remake of Ocean's 11. Although, I don't know why they didn't make the Belagio, Caesar's Palace and Bally's Terry Benedict's places.

    To me, this would be like having two New York football teams and having them play in New Jersey.

  9. Thanks for dropping in, Adam. Nice dig about the Giants and Jets, too, hehe. Aren't the Nets going to be playing in Brooklyn soon, too?

    Anyway, I thought about the Ocean's movies a few times but wasn't too bothered because in the last one they just created an entirely new casino for the movie instead of using existing ones. It looked kind of fake, but it allowed you to focus on the story a lot more than on the geography.

  10. I read the book and when I saw the preview for this movie, I was able to point out about 20 inaccuracies from the preview alone. First of all, in the book everyone is Asian, and for good reason. Secondly, who just magically needs $300,000 for school? Harvard charges you up front? Anyway, glad that your review saved me $8-$10 for admission... I will have to Netflix it when it comes out on DVD.

  11. Ha, yeah I left the tuition thing alone, but it was a little much wasn't it? I don't know if the scholarship thing is true, either, but all of those motives came together poorly. Don't fully half of people who go to med school (or college, for that matter) not have the money for it? Are they all scheming?

  12. I just have an addendum here, from The New Republic and one of the best things I've read in years.

    Thanks to a commenter at MovieZeal's review.


Related Posts with Thumbnails